Reading

Paul Tillich, The Nature of Religious Language,  Reading Response #1 I think the head that Tillich is trying to define is that deity is the primaeval pass of theology. Without a doubt, God is the service to the query of theology. Yet, where bed we find the answer? For Tillich, he believes that the answer is implied in the abridgment of being. Tillich turns the question of God to the question of being from which the answer to the question of God lies. Examining the question of being - What is being-itself? is not to bear witness the crabbed being or a group of beings. Rather, it is to experience the question of what it means to be. What the Buddha Taught Reading Response #2 (Option B) I find it difficult to classify Buddhism as a religion. The Buddha was hardly a human being and never claimed to be to a greater extent than that. He was not the incarnation of God or a visionary of God. All of his insight he attributed to his own movement and intelligence. He believ ed that all doctrine should be questioned, even the Buddhas. Buddhism is much of a path for the individual to travel, than a faith or belief.

Jeremias oration on the mature - Reading Response #4 In teaching the sermon on the Mount I found Jeremias to give tongue to that this was gospel not natural law and that we may not give out it perfectly, but in the power of His Spirit we must course at livelihood it. Living the Sermon on the Mount means, fundamentally, submitting to the authority of Jesus. The Sermon on the Mount is intended to line the ways in which the followers of Jesus should behave in l iving a life of acceptance of Gods gracious ! invitation to innovate the kingdom of heaven.If you want to get a full essay, outrank it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay